August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Bypassing V1: Orientation selectivity in hMT+ of cortically-blinded patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Tina T. Liu
    Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • Helena P. Bachmann
    Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • Matthew R. Cavanaugh
    Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
    Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
  • Berkeley K. Fahrenthold
    Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
    Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
  • Michael D. Melnick
    Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
    Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
    Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
  • Shruti Japee
    Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • Krystel R. Huxlin
    Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
    Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
    Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
  • Elisha P. Merriam
    Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH002966; NCT00001360).
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 4738. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.4738
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Tina T. Liu, Helena P. Bachmann, Matthew R. Cavanaugh, Berkeley K. Fahrenthold, Michael D. Melnick, Shruti Japee, Krystel R. Huxlin, Elisha P. Merriam; Bypassing V1: Orientation selectivity in hMT+ of cortically-blinded patients. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):4738. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.4738.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Orientation selectivity is a core property of primary visual cortex (V1) in mammals, yet patients with V1 damage can relearn orientation discrimination at trained, blind-field locations. What neural machinery underlies such recovery? Here, we explore 2 possible mechanisms involving plastic changes in 1) perilesional V1, and/or 2) visual pathways that bypass V1 and transfer information directly to extrastriate cortex, which uses it to construct orientation-selective signals. We conducted two fMRI experiments at 3T and 7T, in which 4 V1-stroke patients (age: 17–63 years, 2 females, 3 right V1 strokes) viewed oriented gratings while performing a demanding task at fixation. In Expt 1, stimuli were large (10° radius), sinusoidal gratings centered on fixation, whose orientation progressed through 16 evenly-spaced angles (0-180°) over a 24s period (Freeman et al. 2011). In Expt 2, stimuli were small (2.5° radius), oriented (45° or 135°), sinusoidal gratings, presented peripherally (7.1-8.6° eccentricity), deep within the blind or intact visual hemifield. In Expt 1, we observed reliable, orientation-selective responses in ipsilesional hMT+, which is well-known to retain activity after V1 damage (Ffytche et al., 1996; Baseler et al., 1999; Morland et al., 2004; Ajina et al., 2015; Papanikolaou et al., 2019). However, because the large grating stimulated the intact field, the blind field, and the spared visual field simultaneously, we could not rule out a contribution from peri-lesional V1. In Expt 2, we also observed reliable responses in ipsilesional hMT+ for oriented stimuli entirely inside the blind field. Ongoing analyses aim to assess the strength and selectivity of these hMT+ responses, but the fact remains that they may have been elicited in the absence of orientation-selective input from V1. This would suggest a remarkable level of plasticity for this fundamental, low-level visual feature and poses questions regarding how it arises in the residual visual circuitry.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×