August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Topographic constraints on visual development
Author Affiliations
  • Michael J Arcaro
    University of Pennsylvania
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 4677. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.4677
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Michael J Arcaro; Topographic constraints on visual development. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):4677. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.4677.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Primates are remarkably good at recognizing faces and objects in their visual environment, even after just a brief glimpse. How do we develop the neural circuitry that supports such robust perception? The anatomical consistency and apparent modularity of face and object processing regions indicate that intrinsic constraints play an important role in the formation of these brain regions. Yet, the neonate visual system is limited and develops throughout childhood. Here, I will discuss work on the development of the human and nonhuman primate visual systems. These studies demonstrate that regions specialized in the processing of faces are the result of experience acting on an intrinsic but malleable neural architecture. Subcortical and cortical topographic connectivity play a fundamental role, providing an early scaffolding that guides experience-driven modifications. Within the visual system, this connectivity reflects an extensive topographic organization of visual space and shape features that are present at birth. During postnatal development, this proto-architecture is modified by daily experience to become selectively responsive to frequently encountered elements of the environment. Anatomical localization is governed by correspondences between maps of low-level feature selectivity and where in visual space these features are typically viewed. Thus, rather than constituting rigidly pre-specified modules, face and object processing regions instead reflect an architecture that builds on topographic scaffolds to learn and adapt to the regularities of our visual environment.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×