August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Individual differences in gaze behavior: Comparing high-level and sensory contributions
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dyllan Simpson
    University of Toronto Mississauga
  • Benjamin Wolfe
    University of Toronto Mississauga
  • Anna Kosovicheva
    University of Toronto Mississauga
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by a UTM Undergraduate Research Grant to D.S. and an NSERC Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2022-03131) to A.K.
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 5502. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5502
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dyllan Simpson, Benjamin Wolfe, Anna Kosovicheva; Individual differences in gaze behavior: Comparing high-level and sensory contributions. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):5502. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5502.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Individual differences in gaze behavior are well-established across a range of tasks and stimuli, from examining natural scenes to visual search, but their source is less well-understood. Some differences may arise from variation in high-level strategies for a specific visual task, while others may arise from individual differences in sensory processing (e.g., variation in visual crowding). To examine the contributions of these factors to individual differences in scan paths, we asked participants to perform one of two tasks (a visual search task or an ensemble perception task) on the same stimulus array, consisting of a set of radial frequency patterns arranged in an annulus around an initial central fixation. In the ensemble task, participants reported the average amplitude of the patterns, and in the visual search task, they reported whether a four-pointed shape was present among five-pointed shapes. In each task, we found large individual differences in scan paths between participants, with large variability in initial saccade direction. As expected, in each task, we observed higher trial-to-trial correlations in scan paths within than between participants. These correlations were affected by task alone, since the stimuli were identical; trial-to-trial correlations were higher within participants in our ensemble task than in our search task, indicating that strategies based on task demands contribute to these differences. Finally, to measure the contributions of differences in peripheral vision, we separately measured local differences in the strength of crowding for each participant. We measured critical spacing at a set of 12 peripheral locations around the annulus, comparing these values to participants’ initial saccade direction. This revealed a correlation (r = .21) between the proportion of initial saccades to a given location and critical spacing at the corresponding location. Together, these results suggest that high-level differences and sensory differences contribute differently to idiosyncrasies in participants’ gaze behavior.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×