Journal of Vision Cover Image for Volume 23, Issue 9
August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
The Role of Instructional Motivation and Stimulus Properties on Other-Race Effects
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Cindy M. Bukach
    University of Richmond
  • Brianna Chalrton
    University of Richmond
  • Pascaline Munezero
    University of Richmond
  • Erin Hugee
    University of Richmond
  • Natalie Benham
    University of Richmond
  • Patrick Sutphin
    University of Richmond
  • Maruti Mishra
    University of Richmond
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  James S. McDonnell Foundation Scholars Award in Human Cognition to Cindy M. Bukach; University of Richmond Arts & Sciences Student Research Award to Brianna Charlton.
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 5491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5491
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Cindy M. Bukach, Brianna Chalrton, Pascaline Munezero, Erin Hugee, Natalie Benham, Patrick Sutphin, Maruti Mishra; The Role of Instructional Motivation and Stimulus Properties on Other-Race Effects. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):5491. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5491.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Other-race effects (ORE) are likely due to both perceptual experience and higher-level social cognitive processes, though motivation continues to take precedence in many models. For example, Young & Hugenberg’s Categorization-individuation Model suggests that perceptual experience matters only if viewers are motivated to individuate faces. Otherwise, viewers categorize other-race faces. However, motivation is often operationally defined as instructions to individuate other-race faces, and support for the effectiveness of motivational instructions is mixed. One possible explanation for conflicting results is stimulus characteristics, such as the presence of non-facial features (hair) that could aid non-expert recognition. Moreover, it is crucial to consider whether instructions improve other-race recognition, or simply reduce same-race recognition. The present study tests the impact of motivation and stimuli characteristics on ORE in memory. We used a mixed factorial design with Stimulus Race (Black White) as the within-subjects factor, Motivation (Instructed, Control) and Stimulus Hair (Hair, No-Hair) as between-subjects factors, and sensitivity as the dependent measure. White subjects (N = 146) studied ten neutral faces from each race (randomized), completed a filler task, and then completed a 2AFC memory task with 20 smiling faces from each race. This procedure was repeated twice with different faces. Results replicated a reduction in ORE for motivated subjects (p = .003), however motivation decreased same-race recognition (p = .040), and had no effect on other-race recognition (p = .312). The effect of hair did not interact with motivation. Nonetheless, stimulus hair reduced the ORE (p = .003), having a greater impact on same- than other-race faces. We conclude that motivation, as defined by instruction, is not sufficient to improve other-race recognition, regardless of the presence or absence of hair. While motivation instructions may help to improve attentional mechanisms, it seems unlikely that it can overcome other perceptual inadequacies due to lack of experience.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×