August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Discovery of sharper orientation-tuned surround suppression for oblique than cardinal orientations provides support for a multi-stage model of normalization
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hui-Yuan Miao
    Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University
  • David Coggan
    Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University
  • Frank Tong
    Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University
    Vanderbilt Vision Research Center
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Supported by NIH R01EY029278 grant to FT.
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 5426. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hui-Yuan Miao, David Coggan, Frank Tong; Discovery of sharper orientation-tuned surround suppression for oblique than cardinal orientations provides support for a multi-stage model of normalization. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):5426.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Surround suppression can reduce the perceived contrast of a stimulus when the neighboring surround is visually similar due to inhibitory neural interactions. While human observers are much better at discriminating small differences in orientation that are near cardinal rather than oblique (i.e., the oblique effect), it is unknown whether surround suppression might reveal a similar orientation-tuned anisotropy. To address this question, we conducted an intensive psychophysical study (5280 trials/observer, N=12) in which participants reported which of two identically oriented circular figures appeared higher in contrast: one was isolated while the other was surrounded by a bandpass-filtered pattern that differed in mean orientation (range, 0-90˚). Surround suppression at each relative orientation was measured using an adaptive staircase to adjust the contrast of the isolated figure until it matched the perceived contrast of the figure with surround. The orientation tuning of surround suppression was then estimated by fitting a Gaussian function to these psychophysical data. Surprisingly, we discovered that surround suppression was more broadly tuned around cardinal (SD=18.4°) than oblique orientations (SD=11.1°). To investigate how these findings might be accounted for under a divisive normalization framework, we evaluated multiple models by simulating neuronal populations with either greater representation or sharper tuning for near-cardinal orientations. The only model that could account for our findings included three key components: more near-cardinal than near-oblique units, local non-orientation-selective normalization of responses within the center population and within the surround population, followed by orientation-selective normalization across the center and surround populations to induce surround suppression. Models without local non-selective normalization could not account for our data, nor could models that only assumed sharper orientation tuning for units preferring near-cardinal orientations. Overall, our results reveal that surround suppression leads to a counterintuitive oblique effect that likely arises from multiple stages of divisive normalization in the human visual system.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.