August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Lingering distractor representations bias memory reports
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ziyao Zhang
    The University of Texas at Austin
  • Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock
    The University of Texas at Austin
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was completed with support from the National Institute of Health Grant R01EY028746 awarded to J.A.L.-P
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 5383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5383
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ziyao Zhang, Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock; Lingering distractor representations bias memory reports. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):5383. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5383.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Working memory must persist through distraction to guide goal-directed behaviors. Prior research has consistently shown that memory reports are systematically biased towards distractors from the same feature space as memoranda, but the neural mechanisms that drive this effect are not well understood. We hypothesized that distractor interference could arise from memory representations being shifted towards the distractors or from distractor representations that linger in working memory. Here, we recorded EEG signals from N = 23 participants (M = 19.1 years, 20 females) while they performed a delayed-estimation task with a distraction task inserted into the delay period. Participants encoded two orientations and were provided with a retro-cue (80% validity) to prioritize one of them. A brief visual ping (3 white circles) was shown to reactivate memory representations before participants reproduced the probed orientation. In half of the trials, a sensory-motor distraction task was inserted into the delay period in which participants manually rotated a black bar to match the orientation of a white bar on the screen. Behavioral results showed reliable attractive biases towards distractors for both prioritized (3.0 °) and unprioritized memories (1.6 °). Multivariate EEG analyses revealed that the prioritized orientation was reliably decoded in trials without distraction, but not in trials that included distraction. In these trials, the distractor orientation was decoded instead, and larger attractive biases were found in trials that showed stronger distractor representations. Importantly, the loss of decodability of prioritized memories did not lead to catastrophic memory loss. These memories could have been preserved in another region or format to survive the distraction, or they could have been stored silently during distraction and then reactivated to guide memory responses. Regardless, these findings suggest that attractive biases in memory reports following distraction are driven by lingering distractor representations, not by biased memory representations.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×