August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Brain signatures during perceptual decision-making index variations in internal processing and decision boundary
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Johan Nakuci
    Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Jason Samaha
    University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Dobromir Rahnev
    Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  National Institutes of Health grant R01MH119189 and the Office of Naval Research grant N00014-20-1-2622
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 5143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5143
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Johan Nakuci, Jason Samaha, Dobromir Rahnev; Brain signatures during perceptual decision-making index variations in internal processing and decision boundary. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):5143. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5143.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that humans and animals switch between different modes of processing during perceptual decision-making tasks. However, meaningful variations in internal processing remain difficult to discover and characterize. Here we utilize a data-driven clustering method based on modularity-maximation to identify consistent spatial-temporal EEG activity patterns across individual trials and relate this activity to behavioral performance. Subjects (N = 25) performed a motion direction discrimination task with six interleaved levels of motion coherence. We identified two subtypes of trials, Subtype 1 and Subtype 2. Subtype 1 contained event-related potentials with significant positive amplitude in occipital but negative amplitude in frontal areas over the 300 ms of stimulus presentation, whereas Subtype 2 exhibited the opposite pattern. Further, these patterns extended beyond the window of stimulus presentation. Surprisingly, even though the first subtype occurred more frequently with lower motion coherences (Z = -4.06; p = 4.72 x 10-5), it was nonetheless associated with faster response times (RT: Subtype 1 = 926 ± 3ms; Subtype 2 = 952 ± 4ms; t-value = -6.97; p = 3.29 x10-12). Modeling with the drift diffusion model suggested that the first subtype was characterized by higher decision boundary (DB Subtype 1: 1.5 ± 0.20; Subtype 2: 1.55 ± 0.20; t-value = -3.81; p = 0.001). These results demonstrate that brain activity measured with EEG can be used to distinguish subtypes of trials differing in their underlying internal processes, opening up a new way to identify brain states relevant to cognition and behavior.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×