August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Feature-selective mechanisms that underlie the perception of causality
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sven Ohl
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • Martin Rolfs
    Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  SO was supported by the DFG (OH 274/2-2). MR was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 865715), and by the DFG (grants RO3579/8-1 and RO3579/10-1).
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 5104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5104
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sven Ohl, Martin Rolfs; Feature-selective mechanisms that underlie the perception of causality. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):5104. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5104.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The perception of causality in Michotte-type launch events (one disk moves towards another, then stops while the other starts moving in the same direction) is reduced in response to visual adaptation (a negative aftereffect), allowing us to experimentally dissect the mechanisms underlying the visual detection of cause and effect. Here, we determine whether launches with different motion directions, speeds, motion kinematics and conjunctions between motion direction and color result in transfer of adaptation to constrain the computations underlying the perception of causality. In four experiments, we presented simple launch events, varying in the degree of overlap when the first disk stopped and the second started moving (zero to full overlap in seven steps), and asked observers to indicate whether one disk caused the second disk to move or whether the first disk passed the stationary one. To characterize observers’ perception of causality, we fitted psychometric functions to each individual’s reports as a function of overlap, both before and after the repeated exposure to an adaptor. We observed strong negative aftereffects across all experiments. Observers were less likely to report a causal launch following adaptation when adaptor and test events had similar characteristics. First, adaptation was specific to the direction of the adapting stimulus (Experiment 1). Second, both slow and fast launches resulted in adaptation with transfer across the two motion speeds (Experiment 2). Third, a single disk—replaying the motion kinematics of a two-disk launch—resulted in adaptation, albeit smaller than for events with two disks (Experiment 3). Finally, in launches composed of disks with different colors, adaptation transferred across colors while the adaptation was again selective for motion direction (Experiment 4). These findings provide compelling evidence that the perception of causality is closely linked to motion processing in that the underlying computations are embedded within motion-direction selective channels.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×