August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Probing the prioritization of multiple spatial locations held in working memory.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jordan Garrett
    University of California, Santa Barbara
    Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies
  • Daniel Thayer
    University of California, Santa Barbara
    Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies
  • Thomas Sprague
    University of California, Santa Barbara
    Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies
  • Barry Giesbrecht
    University of California, Santa Barbara
    Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Research was sponsored by the U.S. Army Research Office and accomplished under contract W911NF-19-D-0001 for the Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies, a Sloan Research Fellowship, and a UCSB Senate Research Grant.
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 5779. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5779
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jordan Garrett, Daniel Thayer, Thomas Sprague, Barry Giesbrecht; Probing the prioritization of multiple spatial locations held in working memory.. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):5779. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5779.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Working memory (WM) is a capacity limited system that utilizes attention-based mechanisms to prioritize information critical for accomplishing behavioral goals. Internal representations held within an active state are insulated from distractions, have a higher probability of successful retrieval, and can bias behavioral responses. There is evidence that multiple prioritized representations can simultaneously facilitate target detection in visual search tasks compared to non-prioritized counterparts, but it is unclear if all items in WM contribute equally. Here, we investigated whether the degree of prioritization differs across multiple goal-relevant representations maintained in WM by assessing the ability of each item to incidentally direct attention during a secondary visual search task. Participants (n=27) performed a spatial WM task that required them to memorize the sequential order of four stimuli (500ms each) within an array of possible locations. After a brief delay interval (1000ms), participants then completed a 2AFC visual search task. Subsequent to the search task, participants were required to recall the memorized sequence. Based on the serial position effect, locations presented at the start and end of the memory sequence were expected to have the highest degree of prioritization, as evidenced by search task performance. Recall differed as a function of serial position, such that accuracy was highest for the first item in the sequence versus subsequent items (Bayes Factor, BF=5.41). Reaction time (RT) was faster on the search task when the target appeared in a location maintained in WM (M=1.28, SEM=0.09s) compared to those outside of memory (M=2.09, SEM=0.19s) (BF=3.91e4), despite the remembered locations being irrelevant to the search task. Notably, when the target was presented in a memorized location, RT did not differ as a function of serial position (BF=0.02). These results suggest that the degree of prioritization across multiple goal-relevant WM representations may be equivalent.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×