August 2023
Volume 23, Issue 9
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2023
Assessing the accuracy of eye-tracking through passive filter and active shutter-glasses.
Author Affiliations
  • Sophie Kenny
    VPixx, Canada
  • Jonathan Tong
    VPixx, Canada
  • Amanda Estephan
    VPixx, Canada
Journal of Vision August 2023, Vol.23, 5672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5672
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sophie Kenny, Jonathan Tong, Amanda Estephan; Assessing the accuracy of eye-tracking through passive filter and active shutter-glasses.. Journal of Vision 2023;23(9):5672. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5672.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Stereoscopic 3D and other binocular stimuli are often presented dichoptically on a single display through “active” systems, using shutter glasses, or “passive” systems, using glasses with polarizing filters. Since both methods operate by partially blocking or filtering out light, researchers who wish to couple these methods with infrared eye-tracking may be concerned about the clarity of eye-tracking signals (e.g. corneal reflections, pupil location and size). We characterized and quantified the impact of passive and active stereo specialized eyewear on eye-tracking data collected on a tabletop, research-grade TRACKPixx3 eye tracker. Participants completed a calibration and fixation task under three fully counterbalanced conditions:1) wearing a pair of active LCD shutter glasses, 2) wearing a pair of passive glasses with polarization filters, and 3) without specialized eyewear. When wearing passive glasses, some participants required a recalibration attempt to achieve a criterion of less than 1 degree of error. However, while wearing shutter glasses, several participants exceeded four calibration attempts. In contrast, when participants wore no specialized eyewear, calibration was successful after one attempt. Following calibration, participants performed a 36-point fixation task, with fixation targets spanning the central 20-degrees, horizontally, and 12-degrees, vertically. We compared error measurements between each condition. The best performance was achieved when wearing no specialized glasses, followed by passive filter glasses, and shutter glasses generally gave rise to the most significant error. When researchers require high-precision eye-tracking with dichoptic single-display stimuli, passive filter eyewear can be expected to produce comparable results to no eyewear. However, with shutter glasses, researchers can expect increased eye-tracking errors. We recommend that, as appropriate for their experiment paradigm, researchers could plan to relax the calibration criteria threshold to retain a maximum of participants or increase their sample size if high tracking precision is required.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×