December 2023
Volume 23, Issue 15
Open Access
Optica Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2023
Poster Session I: Divided attention in Sign Language Recognition
Author Affiliations
  • Dave Young
    Department of Psychology, University of Washington
  • Jasmine F. Awad
    Department of Psychology, University of Washington
  • Ione Fine
    Department of Psychology, University of Washington
    Center for Human Neuroscience, University of Washington
  • Dina V. Popovkina
    Department of Psychology, University of Washington
Journal of Vision December 2023, Vol.23, 45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.15.45
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dave Young, Jasmine F. Awad, Ione Fine, Dina V. Popovkina; Poster Session I: Divided attention in Sign Language Recognition. Journal of Vision 2023;23(15):45. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.15.45.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Previous work suggests that the brain has a limited ability to process multiple visual stimuli during divided attention: for example, people can recognize only one word at a time (White, Palmer, & Boynton, Psych Science 2018). Here, we examine whether American Sign Language (ASL) experience affects divided attention for stimuli: do signers & non-signers differ in their ability to process two signs at once? In a probe recognition paradigm, participants were presented with two letter signs, one or both of which were pre-cued as relevant (single- and dual-task conditions, respectively), and then responded whether a probe sign matched the cued sign(s). The dual-task deficit is the difference in performance between the single- and dual-task conditions and measures the cost of dividing attention. Preliminary data show that hearing non-signers and signers had a similar dual-task deficit (11.8% ± 2.2%, n = 5 vs. 11.4% ± 1.5%, n = 6), with no significant difference between the groups (t(7.27) = 0.18, p = 0.86). The magnitude of these divided attention effects is consistent with processing limits observed for object judgments (e.g. Popovkina, Palmer, Moore, & Boynton, JoV 2021). Thus, these preliminary results suggest that the attentional demands of ASL sign processing are similar in signers and non-signers.

Footnotes
 Funding: Funding: Mary Gates Endowment, Arc of Washington Trust Fund, University of Washington, Special Diversity Fellowship, Bolles Dissertation Funds
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×