December 2023
Volume 23, Issue 15
Open Access
Optica Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2023
Poster Session I: Non-rivalrous interocular contrast integration across the human visual cortex hierarchy
Author Affiliations
  • Kelly Chang
    University of Washington
  • Xiyan Li
    Department of Psychology, University of Washington
    Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego
  • Kimberly Meier
    Department of Psychology, University of Washington
  • Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington
  • Geoffrey M. Boynton
    Department of Psychology, University of Washington
  • Ione Fine
    Department of Psychology, University of Washington
Journal of Vision December 2023, Vol.23, 29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.15.29
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kelly Chang, Xiyan Li, Kimberly Meier, Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch, Geoffrey M. Boynton, Ione Fine; Poster Session I: Non-rivalrous interocular contrast integration across the human visual cortex hierarchy. Journal of Vision 2023;23(15):29. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.15.29.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Here, using functional MRI, we measured interocular interactions as a function of contrast presented to each eye under non-rivalrous dichoptic viewing conditions. Methods: Activity was measured from early visual cortex (V1 – V3) while participants (n = 5) viewed dichoptic gratings (2-cpd) that independently varied in contrast over time in each eye at 1/6 and 1/8 Hz. We fit a model [((L^m+R^m ))/2]^(1/m) to quantify how the neural response was driven by the contrast in each eye (L and R), where m = 1 represents simple averaging, and as m → ∞ the model shifts towards a max rule, where responses are driven by the eye presented with highest contrast. Results: Across all visual areas, responses were much closer to a max than a mean model, suggesting that neural responses were primarily driven by the eye presented with highest contrast. Within V1, similar findings have been described using a normalization model (Moradi & Heeger, 2009). The magnitude of m increased across the visual hierarchy (V1: m = 1.82; R2 = 0.32; V2: m = 12.94, R2 = 0.28; V3: m = 13.31, R2 = 0.27). Conclusions: The neural response integrating signals from each eye approaches a simple maximum as the contrast signal propagates from V1 through V3. This is consistent with previous behavioral data showing that visually typical observers tend to report perceiving the maximum contrast presented to each eye (Meier et al., 2023).

Footnotes
 Funding: Funding: Knights Templar Eye Foundation, Research to Prevent Blindness, UW Center for Human Neuroscience, Unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness to UW Department of Ophthalmology
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×