September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Temporal dynamics of foveal and peripheral visual discrimination during fixation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sanjana Kapisthalam
    University of Rochester
  • Martina Poletti
    University of Rochester
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Meta Platforms inc.
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 893. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.893
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sanjana Kapisthalam, Martina Poletti; Temporal dynamics of foveal and peripheral visual discrimination during fixation. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):893. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.893.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The ability to simultaneously monitor stimuli at the center of gaze and across the rest of the visual field during fixation is vital for survival. Here we examine how visual discrimination for concurrently monitored foveal and peripheral stimuli changes during the course of fixation. Two Gabors (8cpd, 2 degrees diam), were presented, one at the center of the display and another 8 degrees away. Participants (N=6) were instructed to saccade to the central stimulus, and after a variable delay (0-450ms), one Gabor briefly (50ms) changed orientation. Subjects reported the direction of the orientation change and its location. To prevent visual fading the peripheral Gabor was jittered throughout the presentation time. Stimulus contrast was adjusted separately for foveal and peripheral stimuli to yield ~65% of correct responses when the orientation change occurred between 150-300 ms after saccade landing. Trials with microsaccades were discarded. Our results show that in the initial 150ms of fixation, performance was higher for foveal vs. peripheral stimuli (0.67±0.07 vs 0.50±0.02, p = 0.002). However, this foveal advantage diminished over time, and eventually performance for foveal stimuli reached chance level after 300 ms. Conversely, performance steadily improved during fixation for peripheral stimuli. 300 ms after saccade landing performance was better for peripheral stimuli (0.50±0.09 vs 0.67±0.10, p = 0.003). Here we show that visual discrimination varies greatly even during short fixation periods. Early on during fixation visual discrimination is better for foveal stimuli whereas later on this pattern flips. As in most circumstances, fixation periods are shorter than 500ms, these results may reflect the natural tendency of the visuomotor system to start preparing for the next saccade after 300 ms of fixation. This study provides critical insights into the interplay between foveal and peripheral processing during fixation and advances our understanding of the temporal dynamics of visual perception.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×