September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Seeing beauty even when none may exist
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Chenxiao Guan
    Zhejiang University
  • Yongqi Li
    Zhejiang University
  • Mowei Shen
    Zhejiang University
  • Hui Chen
    Zhejiang University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.32171046), Science and Technology Innovation 2030- “Brain Science and Brain-like Research” Major Project (No.2022ZD0210800) awarded to author H.C.
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 819. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.819
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chenxiao Guan, Yongqi Li, Mowei Shen, Hui Chen; Seeing beauty even when none may exist. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):819. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.819.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Belief, serving as a foundational source of insights for navigating the world, plays a crucial role in shaping cognitive processes such as perception, attention and memory. Considering aesthetics, typically framed as subjective experience, we explore the question: can belief influence or even reshape this experience? In a series of experiments, we designed a specific task demonstrating the role belief plays in aesthetics. In a competition task, two subjects respond as fast as possible to artworks after presented for 3s, followed by feedback on winning or losing. Subsequently, a recognition task and a rating task were carried out. During the recognition task, participants were presented with artworks from the competition and novel pieces. They were prompted to indicate whether they had seen this artwork in the competition and specify whether they won or lost. In the rating task, they provided aesthetic ratings for both the competition and novel artworks. All the artworks were selected from The Vienna Art Picture System and the initial aesthetic ratings between conditions were counterbalanced. The results unveil intriguing patterns. In Exp.1, participants completed the recognition task followed by the rating task, revealing higher aesthetic ratings for novel artworks compared to those actually shown. Surprisingly, artworks recognized (or reported) as previously displayed received significantly higher aesthetic ratings than those recognized as not shown (even when they might not displayed), indicating that the belief of having seen the artwork impacts aesthetic evaluations. Exp.2 altered the task order to avoid the influence of the recognition task on ratings, yet the same effect persisted. In Exp.3, we introduced a more realistic competitive environment and found consistent results. In Exp.4, participants from Exp.3 underwent the same recognition and rating tasks a month later, and the effect endured. Collectively, these findings suggest that the belief possesses the capacity to alter aesthetic ratings.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×