September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
More predictive, easier to detect? Contrast sensitivities in different predictability contexts
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Seyoon Song
    School of Psychology, Korea University
  • Minsun Park
    School of Psychology, Korea University
  • Chai-Youn Kim
    School of Psychology, Korea University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  NRF-2023R1A2C2007289
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 814. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.814
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Seyoon Song, Minsun Park, Chai-Youn Kim; More predictive, easier to detect? Contrast sensitivities in different predictability contexts. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):814. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.814.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Top-down information such as prediction can aid sensory processing, since bottom-up signals can often be dynamic, ambiguous, and even low in salience (Bar, 2004). Our previous study showed higher contrast sensitivity to targets matching the predictive information, suggesting enhancements in human low-level perceptual performance due to predictive processing (Song et al., 2023). Building on this, we explored whether this enhancement effect can be modulated by the degree of predictability. The task was to report the orientation of the target Gabor patch, whose contrast level was adaptively manipulated with the 1-up-1-down staircase procedure. Three conditions existed: prediction-regular, prediction-irregular, and control. For the prediction-regular and irregular conditions, a stream of three Gabor patches appeared whose orientations sequentially differed to induce the impression of rotation, followed by a target Gabor patch of orientation matching the rotation direction. Compared to the uniform step angles of 30˚ in the regular condition, the irregular condition introduced an irregular 60˚ step of rotation in the middle to weaken the predictability and reliability of the preceding information. The preceding and target stimuli in the control condition were in random angles. Results showed enhanced contrast sensitivities in both prediction conditions compared to the control, replicating the previous study. Of more relevance to the present study, the group difference between the regular and irregular conditions was insignificant, seeming to suggest against the modulatory effect of predictability. However, a subset of participants showed difference in contrast sensitivity between the two conditions, giving hints of potential predictability effects. This inter-individual variability in the results might stem from the tendency discovered from many participants to find their own rules in the preceding stream, possibly leading to additional predictive information of confounding influence. Considering this variance in further investigations, we aim to provide extensive evidence of predictive processing in low-level visual perception performance.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×