September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Unravelling the interplay of Statistical Learning, Top-Down, and Bottom-Up Mechanisms during target selection: Insights from Behavioural and EEG Experiments
Author Affiliations
  • Carola Dolci
    Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy
  • C. Nico Boehler
    Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Einat Rashal
    School of Psychology, Keele University, United Kingdom
  • Sliann Ben-Hamed
    Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc-Jeannerod, Lyon, France
  • Emiliano Macaluso
    Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, INSERM, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL), U1028 UMR5292, IMPACT, F-69500, Bron, France
  • Leonardo Chelazzi
    Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy
  • Elisa Santandrea
    Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 802. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.802
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Carola Dolci, C. Nico Boehler, Einat Rashal, Sliann Ben-Hamed, Emiliano Macaluso, Leonardo Chelazzi, Elisa Santandrea; Unravelling the interplay of Statistical Learning, Top-Down, and Bottom-Up Mechanisms during target selection: Insights from Behavioural and EEG Experiments. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):802. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.802.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The natural environment exhibits consistent patterns, rendering it repetitive and partially predictable. Statistical learning (SL) enables us to discern these regularities from past experiences to then direct attention toward relevant elements for our objectives. Yet, it remains unclear whether SL collaborates or acts independently of other experience-independent attentional control mechanisms, specifically top-down and bottom-up control. In a series of interconnected experiments, we recorded behaviour and EEG activity during a visual search task to critically examine their interaction during target selection. In Experiment 1, we assessed the combined influence of top-down control (modulated via endogenous cueing - neutral/valid), bottom-up control (introduced by a salient item), and SL (induced by an imbalance in target probability - high/low - across locations) on behaviour. Additionally, Experiments 2 and 3 investigated how the N2pc, an EEG marker related to target selection, was impacted by the interplay of SL with top-down and bottom-up control, respectively. Simultaneously, SL and bottom-up control enhanced behavioural performance for targets at high (vs. low) frequency locations and for salient (vs. non-salient) targets. Crucially, an interaction revealed that the benefit of top-down control for validly cued targets could override the SL effect (Experiments 1-2). Moreover, EEG results indicated a greater N2pc for validly cued and salient targets, but only when at a low-frequency location. This finding suggests compensation for the lower attentional resources allocated to that location due to SL (Experiment 3). In summary, while top-down control and SL closely interact, the latter appears to be mostly independent from bottom-up signals.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×