September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Contour interaction, spatial extent, and size contrast in a visual size illusion
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ryan E.B. Mruczek
    College of the Holy Cross
  • Botamina Girgis
    College of the Holy Cross
  • Emma Stowell
    College of the Holy Cross
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, College of the Holy Cross
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 760. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.760
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ryan E.B. Mruczek, Botamina Girgis, Emma Stowell; Contour interaction, spatial extent, and size contrast in a visual size illusion. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):760. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.760.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Previous research has documented multiple contextual influences on perceived size in classic visual illusions (e.g., Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf), including contour interactions (e.g., Todorović and Jovanović, 2018, Acta Psychologia), spatial extent (Kirsch and Kunde, 2021, Vision Research), and size contrast (e.g., Roberts et al. 2005, Perception). Such studies typically focus on one factor, as multiple factors are difficult to disentangle (but see Roberts et al., 2005). However, the postulated contextual mechanisms are not mutually exclusive. We sought to quantify the relative contributions and potential interactions of size contrast, contour interactions, and spatial extent on illusory changes in perceived size. Participants reported which of two squares (“standard” or “target”) appeared larger. The standard (1.5°) was either isolated (control) or surrounded by four inducers, each composed of a single parallel line and a single perpendicular line (forming the shape of plus or a tack). Across five experiments, we systematically manipulated the separation between the central square and (1) the perpendicular line, (2) the innermost point of the parallel line, and (3) the outermost point of the parallel line (1.5°, 3.25°, of 5° in all cases). This combination of stimulus configurations allowed us systematically explore changes in contour interactions (between parallel edges of the target and inducers), spatial extent (defined as the outermost extent of the inducers), and size contrast (based on the overall size/length of the inducers). The point of subjective equality (PSE) was extracted from psychometric curves (target square size range: 1.2° to 1.8°). We found two main factors influencing perceived size: (1) contour interactions for perpendicular contours near the target made the central target appear larger and (2) larger spatial extents made the central target appear smaller. Overall, our results are consistent with a contour interaction and spatial extent influencing perceived size, with no specific contribution from size contrast.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×