September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Art has no gender, only gender bias
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Claudia Damiano
    University of Toronto
  • Stefanie De Winter
    KU Leuven
  • Nicole Ruta
    KU Leuven
  • Johan Wagemans
    KU Leuven
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was funded by an FWO Junior Postdoctoral Fellowship to S.D.W. (12E0723N), as well as Methusalem Funding (METH/21/02) and an ERC Advanced Grant to J.W. (GRAPPA, 101053925).
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 727. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.727
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Claudia Damiano, Stefanie De Winter, Nicole Ruta, Johan Wagemans; Art has no gender, only gender bias. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):727. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.727.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The Abstract Expressionism art movement was predominantly showcased by men, leading to the exclusion of women artists from the art canon. Art critics of the time also deemed women’s art as “decoration” whereas men’s art was considered “real art”, further marginalizing women artists. Based on this historical context, our study examined whether and how the appreciation of art is influenced by gender biases. Across three experiments (N=800) using 160 Abstract Expressionist paintings by an equal number of men (Pollock, Louis, Twombly, Kline) and women (Krasner, Frankenthaler, Mitchell, Hartigan) artists, we tested whether people show a bias for attributing authorship of artworks to men, and investigated whether artworks created by men and women are evaluated differently. Results confirmed that participants were significantly more likely to judge that the artworks were painted by men (57.07%, p < 0.001), regardless of the actual gender of the artist, specifically if the artworks contained higher levels of black paint (beta = 0.36, t(466) = 6.28, p < 0.001) and angular lines (beta = 0.15, t(466) = 2.37, p = 0.018). Experiments 2 and 3 revealed that artworks thought to be painted by men received significantly lower scores for attributes describing so-called “woman art” (e.g., “decorative”, “childish”), but also for attributes describing “good art” (e.g., “vibrant”, “memorable”), as well as for liking, pleasure, interest, and order (all p < 0.005). These findings suggest that art criticism of the 60s is no longer reflected in art perception by a general audience nowadays. In summary, while there appears to be a general bias in assuming the paintings were created by men, the actual gender of the artists did not significantly impact overall appreciation of the artworks. Instead, the authorship bias, influenced by stylistic elements within the paintings, plays a more significant role in aesthetic evaluations of the paintings.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×