September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Investigating the breadth and strength of perceptual control of Illusory Apparent Motion
Author Affiliations
  • Allison Allen
    University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Matthew Jacobs
    Queen's University
  • Nicolas Davidenko
    University of California, Santa Cruz
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 682. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.682
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Allison Allen, Matthew Jacobs, Nicolas Davidenko; Investigating the breadth and strength of perceptual control of Illusory Apparent Motion. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):682. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.682.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Recently, a stimulus called Illusory Apparent Motion (IAM) was discovered by Davidenko et al. (2017) wherein pixel textures randomly refreshing at a rate of 1.5 Hz generate the appearance of coherent apparent motion. IAM is a maximally ambiguous multistable stimulus that observers may perceive as moving coherently in a countless number of patterns (e.g., translation, shear, rotation, expansion-contraction). The current set of studies explores observers’ ability to perceptually control the appearance of IAM. The first two experiments used paradigms similar to those used with other multistable stimuli. Experiment 1 (n = 99) used a motion-priming persistence task, based on the methods of Davidenko et al. (2017), while experiment 2 (n = 76) used a dynamic report task with no priming, based on the methods of Kohler et al. (2008). In both experiments, participants successfully controlled translational motion by ‘changing’ or ‘holding’ their percepts, indicating that observers are capable of perceptually controlling IAM, similar to other multistable stimuli. Having established this, Experiment 3 (n = 43) explored the breadth of participants’ ability to perceive and control motion in IAM by testing them on 14 types of translational, shear, rotating, and expanding-contracting motion patterns. Participants were able to perceive a wide variety of motion patterns but were limited in the motion patterns they could control. Finally, Experiment 4 (n = 82) aimed to quantify the influence of perceptual control in biasing perceptions of IAM by presenting participants with a motion nulling signal (at above and below each participant’s perceptual threshold) while they attempted to control the motion. We were successful in quantifying the strength of perceptual control of IAM relative to low-level motion signals. Collectively, these studies provide evidence for the breadth and strength of observers’ ability to perceptually control IAM.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×