September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Evidence of parallel processing during divided attention to faces
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Samantha C. Lee
    University of Nevada, Reno
  • Tyler A. Touchstone
    University of Nevada, Reno
  • Lars Strother
    University of Nevada, Reno
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  P30 GM145646
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 657. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.657
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Samantha C. Lee, Tyler A. Touchstone, Lars Strother; Evidence of parallel processing during divided attention to faces. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):657. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.657.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Visual processing of single faces is associated with reduced attentional demands relative to non-face objects, but evidence that this applies to multiple faces is limited. Although face ensemble studies show that multi-face information can be extracted in parallel as a summary statistic, whether we can divide attention across multiple faces to support single-face tasks is not known. We used a divided attention paradigm in which participants made three different kinds of face judgments: (1) gender (male/female), (2) orientation (upright/inverted), and (3) color (red/gray). Judgments were made for either one (single-task) or two (dual-task) faces in a simultaneously-viewed face pair. Our paradigm enabled us to measure dual-task deficits for each type of judgment and to assess the magnitude of deficits with respect to three benchmark models. The unlimited capacity parallel model predicts little if any deficit. The all-or-none serial model predicts a deficit magnitude consistent with an ability to process only one face at a time. Finally, the fixed-capacity model predicts an intermediate result. In addition to measuring dual-task deficits, we also examined the relationship between the two responses in the dual-task condition. Specifically, we used conditional accuracy to test for evidence of response trade-offs, which we again assessed with respect to the three benchmark models. Consistent with previously published results, the unlimited capacity parallel model was the best predictor of the color judgment results. Dual-task deficits for both the gender and orientation judgments were surprisingly small and consistent with the predictions of a fixed-capacity model. The fixed-capacity model also best predicted the trade-off results for gender judgments, but the unlimited-capacity model best predicted the orientation judgment results. Our overall findings show no evidence of all-or-none serial processing of face pairs, unlike results reported in similar divided attention studies of semantic categorization for non-face objects.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×