Journal of Vision Cover Image for Volume 24, Issue 10
September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
The development of Internal noise
Author Affiliations
  • Daphné Silvestre
    McGill University
  • Clara Marty
    McGill University
  • Rémy Allard
    Université de Montréal
  • Armando Bertone
    McGill University
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 646. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.646
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Daphné Silvestre, Clara Marty, Rémy Allard, Armando Bertone; The development of Internal noise. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):646. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.646.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Most behavioral visual development studies have focused on cortical processes, without concurrently investigating pre-cortical function. This study used a novel internal noise paradigm (Silvestre et al., 2018) to estimate calculation efficiency and equivalent input noise (EIN) due to either the amount of light detected by photoreceptors (i.e. photon noise) or internal noise occurring at a cortical level for both static and dynamic information at different developmental periods. Thirteen children (11-13 years, mean= 11.9), fifteen adolescents (14-17 years, mean= 15.6) and fourteen adults (19-39 years, mean= 25.5) participated in this study. All participants completed a 2AFC task to measure contrast thresholds to drifting (2, 7.5, 15 and 30 Hz) and static gratings (0.5 cpd) with and without external noise for different luminance intensities (5-519 Td). The EIN associated with cortical noise significantly differed between the children and adults for the dynamic detection task (p<.05), but not for the static detection task; photon noise did not significantly differ between the children and adults. Calculation efficiency significantly differed between the children and adults (p<.05) for both detection tasks. Regarding the EIN associated with the amount of light detected by photoreceptors, the photon noise reached adultlike levels for the children. However, the calculation efficiency for both detection tasks was significantly lower for the children compared to adults. These results suggest that the cortical noise limiting the processing of a detection task reached adult-like levels for the children for static stimuli, but not for dynamic stimuli, which reached maturity during adolescence and that the maturity of the visual system is reached earlier at the photoreceptor level than at the cortical level.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×