September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Using Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging to track internal attention
Author Affiliations
  • Kabir Arora
    Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Surya Gayet
    Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • J. Leon Kenemans
    Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Stefan Van der Stigchel
    Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Samson Chota
    Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 603. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.603
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kabir Arora, Surya Gayet, J. Leon Kenemans, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Samson Chota; Using Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging to track internal attention. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):603. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.603.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

When multiple items are held in Visual Working Memory (VWM), situational demands may require the prioritization of relevant ones. Previous studies measuring spatial attention using behavior, microsaccades, and electrophysiology suggest that locations where items were encoded play a role during their prioritization, even if their locations need not be explicitly remembered. Whether the engagement of spatial attention during prioritization also enhances sensory processing at encoding locations is currently unclear. Here we implemented a novel EEG paradigm using Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT) to quantify allocation of spatial attention during a VWM task. Participants encoded two items at distinct, frequency-tagged locations, one of which was cued retroactively. We quantified rhythmic brain responses to the individually tagged encoding locations over time as an index of attentional gain. Surprisingly, the RIFT response corresponding to the cued location did not increase following the retro-cue, even though we did observe a distinct cue-locked lateralization of alpha-oscillations - an established neural signature of spatial attention. In a second experiment we successfully verified that our RIFT setup was sensitive enough to measure attention directed to one of two perceived stimuli (as opposed to empty memory locations). Our results suggest that internal prioritization of memory items does not lead to increased visual processing at their encoding locations, despite the presence of other hallmarks of attention. We also show that attentional allocation can reliably be measured with RIFT using EEG (a far more inexpensive option than MEG). While our findings are compatible with previous studies, they reveal striking differences in the way that spatial attention modulates visual processing during the prioritization of memory, as compared to perceptual representations.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×