September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
More effective attentional allocation within visual working memory leads to better subsequent long-term memory performance
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sisi Wang
    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Freek van Ede
    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by a NWO Vidi Grant (14721) and an ERC Starting Grant from the European Research Council (MEMTICIPATION, 850636) to F.v.E..
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.508
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sisi Wang, Freek van Ede; More effective attentional allocation within visual working memory leads to better subsequent long-term memory performance. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):508. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.508.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Classical memory theories propose visual working memory (WM) processing as a key pathway for long-term memory (LTM) generation. Yet exactly how WM processes, such as attentional prioritization of specific mnemonic contents, affect LTM remains elusive. To address this, we employed a two-stage visual WM-LTM task, while tracking observers' eye movements. In the initial WM stage, participants completed a WM-prioritization task with a retrocue indicating the relevant visual object for an upcoming search task. Following a break, participants performed a surprise LTM-recognition task, identifying the object seen in the earlier WM stage. Results at the WM stage revealed more accurate and faster searching for informatively cued objects versus neutrally cued ones, replicating cue-induced attentional prioritization in WM. Crucially, at the LTM stage, we found significantly higher recognition accuracy for objects that were cued during WM (but absent in the search array) compared to both uncued objects and trials with a neutral cue (which showed similar recognition accuracy). These findings show that attentional prioritization during WM improves subsequent LTM performance for the prioritized item without incurring an LTM cost for unprioritized items (while having equal sensory exposure). In addition, through observers' eye-movements we could track attentional allocation after the retrocue. This revealed how attentional allocation during WM affected LTM, with trials with faster attentional allocating in WM having a larger subsequent benefit in LTM. Overall, these results show that attentional prioritization during visual WM affects LTM, and how this is mediated by the effectivity of attentional allocation – offering a mechanistic interpretation that bridges the interaction between WM and LTM.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×