September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Neural evidence for a two-stage model of conscious perception
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Maëlan Q. Menétrey
    Laboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Michael H. Herzog
    Laboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
  • David Pascucci
    Laboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 325130_204898, “Basics of visual processing: the first half second”; grant numbers PZ00P1_179988 and PZ00P1_179988/2)
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.490
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Maëlan Q. Menétrey, Michael H. Herzog, David Pascucci; Neural evidence for a two-stage model of conscious perception. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):490. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.490.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Are we conscious at any moment? Postdictive effects, where later events influence the perception of earlier ones, suggest a two-stage model of conscious perception: extended periods of unconscious information processing (stage 1) occur before a discrete conscious percept emerges (stage 2). These effects are evident in the Sequential Metacontrast Paradigm (SQM), where a sequence of diverging lines is displayed. When one line is spatially offset (i.e., vernier), the offset appears to propagate along the entire stream, even if the vernier is actually presented later. Furthermore, when two verniers with opposite offsets are presented in the stream, they cancel each other and cannot be individually reported. Here, we analyzed electroencephalography (EEG) data during the SQM, presenting either one or two opposite verniers at different locations within the stream, and a control condition with only straight lines. We sought to disentangle the neural correlates of stage 1 —when individual verniers are unconsciously processed— and stage 2 —when an integrated conscious percept emerges. Using temporal decoding, we found that the presence of vernier in the stream (one or two verniers vs. none) can be decoded from occipital EEG activity patterns. Moreover, the earlier the vernier is presented, the earlier it can be decoded. Since this holds true even for conditions with two verniers, where neither is consciously accessible, we interpret this as neural correlates of unconscious processing (stage 1). We then showed that behavioral reports can be instead decoded from parietal EEG activity patterns, emerging later. Since this decoding relates to the reported percepts, we interpret this as neural correlates of conscious perception (stage 2).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×