September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
How do pupillary light responses and microsaccades allude to voluntary and involuntary auditory attention?
Author Affiliations
  • Hsin-I Liao
    NTT Communication Science Laboratories, NTT Corporation
  • Yung-Hao Yang
    NTT Communication Science Laboratories, NTT Corporation
    Department of Intelligence Science and Technology, Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University
  • Shimpei Yamagishi
    NTT Communication Science Laboratories, NTT Corporation
  • Yuta Suzuki
    NTT Communication Science Laboratories, NTT Corporation
  • Shigeto Furukawa
    NTT Communication Science Laboratories, NTT Corporation
    Shizuoka Graduate University of Public Health, Shizuoka General Hospital
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.476
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hsin-I Liao, Yung-Hao Yang, Shimpei Yamagishi, Yuta Suzuki, Shigeto Furukawa; How do pupillary light responses and microsaccades allude to voluntary and involuntary auditory attention?. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):476. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.476.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Pupillary light responses (PLR) and microsaccades allude to voluntary and involuntary visual attention, presumably reflecting the function of the frontal eye field and superior colliculus. In line with such allusion to visual attention, we recently found that PLR corresponds to the luminance condition of the voluntarily attended auditory space and object (Liao et al., 2023). This suggests a common audio-visual spatial attention mechanism underlying the neural circuits controlling eye movements. The current study further examines how PLR and microsaccades allude to voluntary and involuntary auditory attention using the same stimuli. Data from Liao et al. (2023) were reanalyzed to investigate the effect of voluntary attention on microsaccades and compare the PLR result with that induced by involuntary attention. To probe involuntary attention, we applied the Posner cueing paradigm. A task-irrelevant yet salient noise burst was presented to the left or right ear (or location) via headphones (or loudspeakers) before the target sound. Participants identified the target sound as quickly as possible while ignoring the noise distractor. Behavioral results confirmed an involuntary attentional shift to the distractor, as evidenced by faster reaction times when the target was presented on the same side as the distractor than when it was presented on the opposite side. Pupillary response, in contrast to the finding relating to voluntary auditory attention in Liao et al. (2023), showed little to no significant difference corresponding to the luminance condition where the distractor was presented. Microsaccades were found to occur in the same direction as the voluntarily attended sound and involuntarily attended distractor at different timings. Opposite microsaccadic directional bias was found only to the distractor, suggesting inhibition of return. These findings suggest an interaction between the top-down modulation and sound-driven attentional orienting underlying the microsaccade-generation system. The PLR reflects voluntary auditory attention but not involuntary auditory attention.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×