Abstract
Interactions between visual memories and percepts have been shown to induce systematic biases in observers’ memory reports. When memories are explicitly compared with percepts, the resulting biases are potent enough to persist long after they are initially reported. However, it remains unclear whether bias persistence is attributable to processes that occur during perceptual comparisons themselves or those that occur when the bias is read out during initial memory reporting. To test this, we asked observers to encode colored object silhouettes into their long-term memory in anticipation of memory testing that occurred immediately after the encoding phase and 24 hours later. At each test, observers were cued to recall a target object from memory by presenting the uncolored target silhouette. Following recognition, the probe silhouette was then re-presented in a color that was sampled proximal to the encoded target color and observers were instructed to either ignore this colored probe or to judge its similarity to the remembered target. Observers then completed the trial by either reporting the remembered target color from a continuous wheel or by completing a search for an uncolored letter. Critically, all objects tested during the immediate test were tested again during the delayed test in a report condition where colored probes were omitted. Within each test, observers’ target reports showed attractive biases towards the colored probes, with larger biases following comparisons than passive viewing. More importantly, comparison-induced biases persisted into the delayed test with comparable magnitude across reported and unreported targets, while biases induced by passively viewing the probe dissipated by the delayed test, even for targets that were initially reported. These findings suggest that processes tied to perceptual comparisons are both necessary and sufficient for the formation of report biases that carry over from one retrieval episode to the next.