September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Variation in cortical responses to neuromodulation: Motor thresholds vs. Visual phosphenes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Remy Cohan
    Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience
    Centre for Vision Research
    Department of Psychology
    York University, Toronto, Canada.
  • Jennifer K.E. Steeves
    Centre for Integrative and Applied Neuroscience
    Centre for Vision Research
    Department of Psychology
    York University, Toronto, Canada.
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This research was funded by the Natural Science And Engineering Research Council of Canada, Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF), Vision Science to Applications (VISTA) .
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.413
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Remy Cohan, Jennifer K.E. Steeves; Variation in cortical responses to neuromodulation: Motor thresholds vs. Visual phosphenes. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):413. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.413.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol with the added benefit of shorter stimulation time (compared to traditional rTMS protocols). This increases efficiency and compliance in both research and clinical settings. Even though TBS applications in the primary motor cortex (M1) have been well-explored, scant attention has been paid to its impact on the primary visual cortex (V1). TBS includes two variants: Intermittent (iTBS; excitatory) and continuous (cTBS; inhibitory). In our lab, previous neuroimaging studies including magnetic resonance spectroscopy and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging did not lead to notable alterations in GABA concentration in V1 or functional connectivity when V1 was stimulated with either cTBS or iTBS. However, we previously found significant effects when applying 1Hz rTMS to V1. This emphasises the need to understand TBS effects on visual brain areas and optimise TBS protocols accordingly. In this study, we explored cTBS' influence on M1 and V1 utilising stereotactic neuronavigation. We investigated the disparities in biophysical parameters such as scalp-to-cortex distance (SCD), electric fields at hotspots and stimulation intensities between M1 and V1. We used motor thresholds (MTs) for M1 stimulation and phosphene thresholds (PTs) for V1 stimulation as markers. Our preliminary results suggest that PTs are significantly higher than MTs despite longer SCD at V1, and shorter SCD at M1. In addition, we found that post-cTBS PTs increased in comparison to sham stimulation, hinting at an inhibitory aftereffect. However, both active and sham cTBS in M1 yielded to increased MTs. A profound understanding of the varied stimulation parameter effects and their location-specific variability is crucial for effective and efficient TMS protocol application in research and therapeutic contexts. These insights will facilitate tailoring TMS approaches to each target region's unique requirements, enhancing the overall effectiveness of TBS in vision research and clinical settings.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×