September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Distractor control facilitates an integration of target features in visual working memory
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hansol Lee
    Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Sun-Young Park
    Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Jiyoun Jeong
    Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Min-Suk Kang
    Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    Center for Neuroscience and Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Suwon, Republic of Korea
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (NRF-2022R1A2C2007363).
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.339
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hansol Lee, Sun-Young Park, Jiyoun Jeong, Min-Suk Kang; Distractor control facilitates an integration of target features in visual working memory. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):339. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.339.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

What is the unit of visual working memory (VWM) representation? Feature-based account posits that features comprising an object are represented independently, but object-based account posits that those features are represented as an integrated format. We sought to tease these two accounts apart by examining whether distractors produce feature specific disruption. If the features are stored independently, distraction against a specific feature should disrupt that feature of representation, keeping the other features intact. However, if the features are integrated in VWM, distraction against a single feature should disrupt the entire representation. Participants (N = 26) were informed to remember target colors in one of two visual hemifields for a short period of time and adjust the color of a single cued item. We manipulated distractor features (color and location) combinatorically, resulting in four trial types. In one, targets and distractors shared the location set (location-repeated) or not (location-distinct), and in the other, they shared the color set (color-repeated) or not (color-distinct). Further, we varied the distractor context from baseline to distraction block. In the baseline block, distractors were absent to establish the natural unit of VWM. The distraction block followed where the distractor-absent and the four distractor-present trials were given. We analyzed response errors of the distractor-present trials with a mixture of precision and guess rate over the two phases of the distraction block. In the first phase, immediately after the baseline block, we found a feature specific disruption. The guess rate was lower, but the precision was worse in the color-repeated than the color-distinct trials. On the other hand, the guess rate was higher, but the precision was superior in the location-repeated than the location-distinct trials. However, the feature-specific disruption becomes nearly absent in the late phase. This adaptive behavior suggests that the distractor control facilitates integrating features of VWM.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×