September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Oculomotor influences on extrafoveal sensitivity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jie Z. Wang
    University of Rochester
  • Michele Rucci
    University of Rochester
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by NIH EY018363 and P30 EY001319
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.334
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jie Z. Wang, Michele Rucci; Oculomotor influences on extrafoveal sensitivity. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):334. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.334.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The human eyes are always in motion, alternating rapid gaze shifts (microsaccades) with slow smooth movements (drifts) even when attending to a single point. In the fovea, these fixational eye movements (FEM) have been shown to enhance sensitivity in complementary spatial frequency ranges, in a way that is consistent with their reformatting of spatial patterns into temporal signals: the luminance modulations from microsaccades and drifts emphasize low and high spatial frequencies, respectively. Outside the fovea, however, the perceptual roles of FEM remain unclear. In the periphery, views range from general functions (‘refreshing’ percepts) to no function because of the little FEM motion relative to receptive fields size. Here we show that FEM lead to similar perceptual consequences inside and outside the fovea. Human observers (N=6) were asked to report the orientation (±45°) of a full-field grating while maintaining fixation. The grating was either at high (10 cpd) or low (0.2 cpd) spatial frequency. To restrict stimulation to the peripheral visual field, a circular gray patch (diameter 15° or 23°) remained stationary on the retina centered on the line of sight. We compared performance in the presence and absence of the retinal motion caused by FEM. In the latter condition, eye movements were counteracted in real-time by moving the stimulus on the display via a custom apparatus. Our results show that, also outside the fovea, drifts and microsaccades selectively improve sensitivity to high and low spatial frequencies, respectively. On average performance dropped by approximately 10% at high frequency when retinal motion was eliminated and improved by a similar amount at low frequency in the trials with microsaccades. Together, these results indicate that FEM operate uniformly throughout the visual field, reformatting luminance patterns into spatiotemporal signals that enhance contrast sensitivity in complementary ranges of spatial frequencies.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×