September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Visual working memory load persists during the comparison phase
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Chong Zhao
    University of Chicago
  • Temilade Adekoya
    University of Chicago
  • Sintra Horwitz
    University of Chicago
  • Edward Awh
    University of Chicago
  • Edward Vogel
    University of Chicago
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  We acknowledge the funding from National Institute of Mental Health (grant ROIMH087214); Office of Naval Research (grant N00014-12-1-0972).
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.330
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chong Zhao, Temilade Adekoya, Sintra Horwitz, Edward Awh, Edward Vogel; Visual working memory load persists during the comparison phase. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):330. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.330.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Working memory is often measured by presenting arrays of visual items to be remembered over a short delay that must be compared with a test display. Extensive work has elucidated the neural mechanisms that support the encoding and maintenance periods of these tasks. Though, little is still understood about the comparison process itself. For example, the contralateral delay activity (CDA) is a sustained EEG component that provides a sensitive measure of the current working memory load during the retention period. However, it is not clear whether this activity continues to track the full working memory load during the comparison phase of the task or if it is reduced to just the one item from the array that is being tested. In Experiment 1, we used a change localization task with 2-item and 4-item arrays of colors. At test, subjects had to report which item changed. We observed that the response-phase CDA for set size 4 was significantly larger than the CDA for set size 2. In Experiment 2 we used a single-probe change detection design, in which only a single item from the original array was shown at test. Despite only a single item shown on the screen, we again observed that the response-phase CDA for set size 4 was still significantly larger than the CDA for set size 2. Our results suggest that the working memory load during test reflects the load from all of the items from the array that were stored.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×