September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Did you look at the moose? Driver gaze behaviour while searching for hazards in dynamic road scenes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jiali Song
    Unersity of Toronto Mississauga
  • Benjamin Wolfe
    Unersity of Toronto Mississauga
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  We thank Dr. Anna Kosovicheva for her guidance and advice throughout the design and analysis of this project. This work was funded by a National Science and Engineering Research Council grant awarded to Benjamin Wolfe (RGPIN-2021-02730).
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.310
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jiali Song, Benjamin Wolfe; Did you look at the moose? Driver gaze behaviour while searching for hazards in dynamic road scenes. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):310. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.310.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Safely responding to a road hazard requires knowing when and where it is in the scene. Conventional eye-tracking studies in traffic safety use direct fixation as a proxy for awareness of the hazard. However, fixation location is a poor indicator of awareness because peripheral vision enables drivers to gather information without direct fixation. Conversely, fixating an object does not necessarily guarantee awareness (e.g. inattentional blindness, looked-but-failed-to-see errors). Given that road scenes change dynamically over time, little is known about when and where drivers look when searching for hazards, particularly when they miss hazards. We investigated these questions by asking drivers (n=8) to watch 262 dashcam videos of near-collisions from the Road Hazard Stimulus dataset. Each video (2-8 sec) contained a hazard that was eventually involved in a near-collision in the left or right half of the video, and participants reported its location. Hazard onset was annotated as the first frame in the video that indicates that a near-collision would occur. We grouped the trials based on whether participants correctly reported the hazard’s location. During the time window immediately prior to hazard onset, drivers’ gaze distance from the hazard decreased over time on correctly localized trials. On incorrect trials, gaze position was significantly further away for 185ms after hazard onset compared to correct trials (t(7)>2.38, p <0.05). Furthermore, participants were more likely to look within the annotated hazard region for correct trials than for incorrect trials, particularly from 480ms before hazard onset and onwards (t(7)>2.37, p<0.05), and intermittently in the 1000ms leading up to the time of response (t(7)>2.37, p<0.05). These results suggest that, on average, drivers look at hazards when they correctly detect them and that looked-but-failed-to-see errors are relatively rare. Rather, incorrect trials are more likely to be “looked too late” or “failed to look” errors.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×