September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Temporal Feature Binding: Attention Mechanisms and Individual Differences
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alon Zivony
    University of Sheffield
  • Martin Eimer
    Birkbeck College, University of London
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 896192 to A. Zivony and from ESRC Grant No. ES/V002708/1 to M. Eimer.
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.211
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alon Zivony, Martin Eimer; Temporal Feature Binding: Attention Mechanisms and Individual Differences. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):211. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.211.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that illusory conjunction can emerge for both spatially and temporally proximal objects. However, the mechanisms involved in binding in the temporal domain are not yet fully understood. In the current study, we investigated the role of attentional processes in correct and incorrect temporal binding, and specifically how feature binding is affected by the speed of attentional engagement. In two experiments (N=40), participants searched for a target in a rapid serial visual presentation stream and reported its colour and alphanumeric identity. Temporal binding errors were frequent. Critically, when participants reported the identity of a distractor instead of a target, they were also more likely to report the colour of this distractor. This finding suggest that attentional engagement facilitates the binding of temporally co-occurring features, and that variability in the speed of attentional engagement plays an important role in determining what we see. Moreover, in both experiments, strong correlations were observed between identity and colour reports across participants: individuals who were more likely to erroneously report the identities of post-target distractors were also more likely to report the colours of post-target distractors. This finding points to substantial and reliable individual differences in temporal selectivity, opening the door to future research on this issue.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×