September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Measuring conscious monitoring and metacognition at the start, middle and end of a reaching movement
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Gabriela Oancea
    University of Alberta, Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation
    University of Alberta, Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute
  • Craig S. Chapman
    University of Alberta, Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation
    University of Alberta, Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  CIHR, NSERC
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 999. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.999
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Gabriela Oancea, Craig S. Chapman; Measuring conscious monitoring and metacognition at the start, middle and end of a reaching movement. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):999. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.999.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The ability to monitor our arm position during goal-directed behaviour allows us to bring our limb to a target as accurately as possible. Despite our success in executing accurate movements, some work suggests that individuals have limited access to information about their limb position (Charles et al., 2020). However, contradictory evidence from metacognition research indicates that people are able to accurately monitor their movements. In these studies, individuals are asked to rate their confidence after making judgements about their movements and tend to give higher confidence ratings when they are correct, showing some capacity for self-monitoring (Arbuzova et al., 2021). These conflicting results suggest that we do not monitor an entire movement. Participants (n=43) made reaching movements toward targets on a screen. They were then presented with two movement paths: one being their actual trajectory and the other being a visually deviated version. Here, we manipulated the location that the deviation was implemented (i.e., start, middle, or end of the path). Participants were asked to determine which trajectory was their own, while also rating their confidence in their response. Overall, accuracy was lower than expected. Nevertheless, accuracy and confidence were higher when deviations occurred in the middle and end of the movement as opposed to the start, suggesting that participants were more aware of their true limb position at the middle and end of their reach. In addition, metacognitive sensitivity was greater during the middle and end implying that at these locations, individuals’ confidence ratings better discriminated between correct and incorrect responses, indicating appropriate self-monitoring. We conclude that people have a remarkable blindness to the properties of their own movements. As well, monitoring of a limb is significantly reduced at the start of a movement suggesting reduced attention to limb position at this time, possibly due to movement programming demands.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×