September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Effort minimization drives saccade selection
Author Affiliations
  • Christoph Strauch
    Utrecht University
  • Damian Koevoet
    Utrecht University
  • Laura Van Zantwijk
    Utrecht University
  • Sebastiaan Mathôt
    University of Groningen
  • Marnix Naber
    Utrecht University
  • Stefan Van der Stigchel
    Utrecht University
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 990. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.990
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christoph Strauch, Damian Koevoet, Laura Van Zantwijk, Sebastiaan Mathôt, Marnix Naber, Stefan Van der Stigchel; Effort minimization drives saccade selection. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):990. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.990.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

What determines where we move our eyes? We here hypothesized saccade costs to determine saccade selection. We first mapped saccade costs across directions by cueing participants to make a saccade towards a specific direction but to withhold the saccade until after the cue had disappeared. During this phase, we measured pupil size - an indicator of noradrenaline release and mental effort - to index cost. Next, we mapped saccade preferences by presenting any two of the previously cost-mapped saccade directions as a two alternative free choice task. For the first time, we here demonstrate that this cost critically underpins saccade selection: When participants chose between the two possible directions, low-effort options were strongly preferred (R2=0.58). Notably, saccades curved away from high-cost directions, suggesting an active weighing of costs and inhibition of costly alternatives. This general principle held when participants searched in natural scenes: cost remained a predictor of saccade direction preferences. Strikingly, effortful saccade directions were disproportionally avoided as soon as overall load was increased by introducing a secondary auditory counting task (R2=0.50). This implies that cognitive resources are flexibly (dis)allocated from and to oculomotor processes as resource demands change. Together, this shows that even the most subtle differences in cost are actively weighed to tune for resource-efficient behavior. Beyond stimulus material and goals, we therefore argue that eye-movement behavior is largely determined by a distinct and equally fundamental factor: effort.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×