September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Sometimes more (overlap) is better! Action plan overlap impacts the interference between visually-guided touch and multiple-object tracking (MOT)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mallory E. Terry
    University of Guelph
  • Vanessa Amelio
    University of Guelph
  • Lana M. Trick
    University of Guelph
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  NSERC
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 985. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.985
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mallory E. Terry, Vanessa Amelio, Lana M. Trick; Sometimes more (overlap) is better! Action plan overlap impacts the interference between visually-guided touch and multiple-object tracking (MOT). Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):985. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.985.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

When two tasks are performed simultaneously their action plans can overlap with one another. Past findings suggest that the overlap can either improve or degrade performance, depending on the relatedness of the required actions (e.g., Fournier et al. 2015). In this study we assessed the impact of overlapping action plans in a multiple-object tracking (MOT) task. Participants tracked 1-4 MOT targets while also touching moving items in MOT that changed colour. To determine the effects of action plan overlap between the MOT and touch task, we manipulated the way that participants reported the identity of the targets at the end of the trial (untimed). In the touch task participants always used the index finger of their dominant hand. To report the targets participants either typed in the letters corresponding to the targets with their non-dominant hand (minimal overlap) or touched MOT targets with the index finger of their dominant hand (maximal overlap). Target report method had no effect on single-task MOT performance. However, when participants had to touch moving items that changed colour during tracking (dual-task), MOT performance was significantly worse when overlap was minimized. It also took participants longer to touch moving items that changed colour - even though target report occurred 7-8 seconds later. Nonetheless, MOT performance was always better and touch latencies lower when the touched items were targets as compared to distractors in MOT; report technique had no effect. This shows a dissociation between the effects of attentional selection in MOT and overlapping action plans.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×