September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
From Curvature to Contour: Hierarchical Representations of Contour Shapes in Terms of Constant Curvature Segments
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kevin Lande
    York University
  • Doug Addleman
    Gonzaga University
  • Denis Buehler
    Ecole Normale Supérieure
  • Cameron Pham
    Loyola University
  • Silvia Rufus
    Loyola University
  • Nicholas Baker
    Loyola University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  The project received funding through a research award from Duke University’s Summer Seminar in Philosophy and Neuroscience.
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 968. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.968
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kevin Lande, Doug Addleman, Denis Buehler, Cameron Pham, Silvia Rufus, Nicholas Baker; From Curvature to Contour: Hierarchical Representations of Contour Shapes in Terms of Constant Curvature Segments. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):968. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.968.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Introduction: We can discriminate a stunning variety of shapes. How does the visual system encode these different shapes? We investigated the hypothesis that the visual system forms hierarchically structured representations of contour shapes, based on primitives that represent segments of constant curvature (CC). This hypothesis implies that (i) in representing a contour, encoding of CC segments is obligatory; (ii) variation in CC segments will induce perceptible differences between contours; and (iii) CC segments can be organized perceptually into higher-order parts. Experiments: In Experiment 1, we displayed contours made from two curvatures and two colors. The transition point for color was near to, but offset from, the transition point for curvature. We then presented the contour again, sometimes shifting the color transition point. When asked whether the coloring was different, participants were much less sensitive to shifts that aligned the color transition with the task-irrelevant curvature transition than to equivalent shifts that increased misalignment. In Experiment 2, we compared participants’ ability to discriminate between a contour fragment made of multiple curvatures and one made of one curvature. Sensitivity was considerably higher when multi-curvature contours were predicted to be represented with multiple CC segments than with a single CC segment. In Experiment 3, we tested a hypothesis that CC segments with the same curvature polarity are represented as higher-order “parts” of a contour. Following Palmer (1977), we tested participants’ ability to say whether a contour fragment was part of a shape. Participants were significantly faster when the fragment was from a polarity-matched contour region. Performance using polarity-matched fragments was comparable to performance using segments between curvature minima. Conclusion: These experiments suggest that CC segments are obligatorily encoded in contour representation (Exp.1), that contour discrimination depends on encoded CC segments (Exp.2), and that CC segments organize together into higher-order units (Exp.3).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×