September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Task-irrelevant motion information modulates working memory representations
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Johan A. Gamba
    University of Florida.
  • Alexei Dawes
    Riken Center for Brain Sciences.
  • Hakwan Lau
    Riken Center for Brain Sciences.
  • Brian Odegaard
    University of Florida.
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  J.A.G. was supported by funded internship at the RIKEN CBS summer program, where this research was initiated
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 1433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1433
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Johan A. Gamba, Alexei Dawes, Hakwan Lau, Brian Odegaard; Task-irrelevant motion information modulates working memory representations. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):1433. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1433.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that working memory (WM) influences perception at both behavioral and neural levels (Kang et al., 2011, D’Esposito & Postle, 2015). For example, holding orientation information from a random dot kinematogram (RDK) in working memory influences subsequent perceptual judgments. However, most studies only require memorizing a single feature; whether multi-feature information held in WM influences perceptual decision-making, and vice-versa, is not fully understood. In this study, we explored both questions by exploiting the “motion repulsion” effect (Marshak & Sekuler, 1979). Thirty-one participants were presented with sequences of three RDKs, where the first (RDK1) and third (RDK3) shared two out of three properties (orientation, speed, or dot density). The task required subjects to report the orientation of the second RDK (RDK2), and also report (and rate confidence for) the property that differed between RDK1 and RDK3. Importantly, an irrelevant feature for the task—RDK2’s speed—was systematically altered across three experiments (exp1: similar speed to RDK1, exp2: faster, exp3: slower). Here, we asked the following question: does manipulation of a task-irrelevant feature (RDK2’s speed) influence the working memory judgment about RDK1 and RDK3? Our findings revealed that the motion repulsion effect, a perceptual phenomenon, was consistently observed at previously-reported angles (30° and 60°), despite the increased cognitive load of our task, which required maintaining multiple features in WM. Notably, in the experiment with the slowest irrelevant speed (exp3), task performance was adversely affected compared to the other conditions. Additionally, a unique pattern of metacognitive sensitivity emerged in the experiment with increased irrelevant speed (exp2): participants exhibited a higher proportion of “low confidence” responses for both correct and incorrect trials. Overall, these results demonstrate that motion repulsion occurs even when multiple features are held in working memory, and reveal an influence of task-irrelevant perceptual information on WM judgments.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×