September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Are effects of perceptual (dis)fluency on social judgments specific to visual processing?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Robert Walter-Terrill
    Yale University
  • Joan Danielle K. Ongchoco
    Yale University
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • Brian Scholl
    Yale University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  RWT was supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship.
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 1413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1413
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Robert Walter-Terrill, Joan Danielle K. Ongchoco, Brian Scholl; Are effects of perceptual (dis)fluency on social judgments specific to visual processing?. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):1413. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1413.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Visual perception is often effortless, but not always: reading, for example, is faster and easier with some fonts compared to others. Such differences in visual *fluency* (the ease, or lack thereof, of information processing) can have profound effects on higher-level cognition and decision-making. When a written passage is held constant, for example, its author may nevertheless be judged as less intelligent (or the message may be judged as less truthful) when the passage is written in a disfluent (but still legible) font. Such effects are often normatively inappropriate, insofar as the ‘vehicle’ of a message (e.g. its font) has no necessary bearing on its actual content (e.g. its truth). Are such effects specific to visual processing, per se, or do they reflect more general perceptual principles? To find out, we explored analogous perceptual (dis)fluency in the auditory domain. In the modern era, the sounds of voices are often determined not only by intrinsic qualities (such as vocal anatomy), but also by extrinsic properties (such as videoconferencing microphone quality). We show that such superficial auditory properties also have surprisingly deep consequences for higher-level social judgments. Listeners heard short narrated passages (e.g. from job application essays), and then made various judgments about the speakers. Critically, the recordings were modified to simulate different microphone qualities, while carefully equating listeners’ comprehension of the words themselves. Common disfluent auditory signals (as in ‘tinny’ speech) led to lower judgments of intelligence, hireability, credibility, and romantic desirability. These effects were robust across speaker gender and accent, and occurred for both human and clearly artificial (computer-synthesized) speech. (And such effects may become more impactful as daily communication via videoconferencing becomes increasingly prevalent.) These results demonstrate that such fluency effects reflect a more abstract form of information processing that transcends visual perception.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×