September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Visual and auditory object recognition in relation to spatial abilities
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Conor J. R. Smithson
    Vanderbilt University
  • Jason K. Chow
    Vanderbilt University
  • Isabel Gauthier
    Vanderbilt University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by the David K. Wilson Chair Research Fund and NSF BCS Award 2316474
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 1385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1385
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Conor J. R. Smithson, Jason K. Chow, Isabel Gauthier; Visual and auditory object recognition in relation to spatial abilities. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):1385. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1385.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Domain-general object recognition (o) is the ability to individuate members of an object category. Visual o is typically measured using novel objects (e.g. Greebles). Stimuli used to measure auditory o include birdsong, mechanical keyboard presses, and laughter. Previous work suggests a nearly perfect correlation across the visual and auditory modalities for this ability (Chow et al., 2023). However, until now the relationship between the two modalities has not been tested in a large sample. We also assess whether o can be distinguished from spatial ability, which has historically dominated measures of visual ability in psychometric studies. Using structural equation modeling with a large sample (n = 283), we estimate the relationships between these abilities at the construct level. We find that visual and auditory o are very closely related (r = .8, 95% CI [.68, .92]), but that this relationship is smaller once the influence of fluid intelligence (Gf) is controlled for (r = .6, 95% CI [.36, .83]). This supports the idea that visual and auditory o may rely substantially on a single cross-modal ability, but that they are nevertheless distinct. Model comparison further supports the claim that visual and auditory o are separable, as a model with distinct visual and auditory abilities had superior fit compared to a model with a single cross-modal ability. Spatial ability was measured using three tests (3D rotation, 2D rotation, paper-folding) and had sizable relationships with both visual (r = .74) and auditory (r = .69) o. However, the associations between spatial ability and both visual and auditory o were no longer significant once Gf was controlled for. O's partial independence from Gf and spatial abilities suggests that it could potentially offer incremental validity if used to predict performance in real-world domains requiring visual abilities.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×