September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Are illusory visual phantoms seen by the motion system: Investigations utilizing the motion aftereffect
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Loic Daumail
    Vanderbilt University
  • Frank Tong
    Imaging Centre for Excellence (ICE), University of Glasgow
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Supported by NIH grants R01EY029278 and R01EY035157 to FT.
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 1351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1351
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Loic Daumail, Frank Tong; Are illusory visual phantoms seen by the motion system: Investigations utilizing the motion aftereffect. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):1351. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1351.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The constructive nature of the brain, such as when visual percepts occur in regions with no direct stimulation, can be investigated through the motion processing system. Here, we investigated the perception of illusory visual phantoms, a form of completion that occurs when two low-contrast collinear drifting gratings are separated by a homogeneous region, leading to the ghostly impression of stripes that extend across the gap. Previous reports have suggested that a motion aftereffect (MAE) can be induced by visual phantoms (Weisstein, 1977; Science); however, our preliminary investigations with static test patterns failed to replicate these reports. We therefore explored whether visual phantoms might elicit an MAE using a dynamic counterphasing test pattern, as higher-level forms of motion perception can often elicit a dynamic MAE (dMAE) even if no static MAE occurs. Our displays consisted of two collinear horizontal gratings (12° × 6°, 0.25 cyc/deg), separated by a vertical (5°) gap, that drifted (2 Hz) during an adaptation phase. A counterphasing grating appeared in the blank gap location during test. Either the darkest portion of the inducer gratings matched the background luminance to elicit vivid phantoms, or the mean luminance of the inducer gratings matched the background luminance as a control condition. Three contrast levels were tested: 2.73%,13.64%, and 63.64%. Participants reported whether the test grating moved upward, downward or whether motion was ambiguous. dMAE was strongly biased in the motion direction opposite to that of the adapting motion direction, but curiously, it appeared equally strong for the visual phantom condition and phantom control condition. These results suggest that even though salient visual phantoms are perceived in some conditions but not others, the perceptual representation of the phantoms does not seem to provide direct input to the visual motion processing system.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×