September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Can “prior knowledge” of isotropy be varied trial by trial? Yes, in slant from texture
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Zihan SHEN
    School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University
  • Zhongting Chen
    School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  the Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation [grant No. 23ZR1417900]
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 1324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1324
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Zihan SHEN, Zhongting Chen; Can “prior knowledge” of isotropy be varied trial by trial? Yes, in slant from texture. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):1324. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1324.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

When perceiving slant from texture, observers tend to presume that elements of texture are initially isotropic. Multiple studies confirm this presumption by showing that variation of aspect ratio of texture (i.e., deviation from isotropy) alters slant perception from texture. However, there is yet little literature on how this “prior knowledge” is made. The current study addressed this issue by attempting to convey “knowledge” of isotropy/anisotropy to observers. We introduced a set of two-folded surfaces, of which the upper parts were slanted and the lower parts frontal-parallel. Both parts were planar but connected smoothly with a curved surface. The whole surface was textured with Voronoi textures and the aspect ratio of texture were independently manipulated for the upper and the lower surfaces, in a range between 0.8 (compressed) to 1.0 (isotropic). The aspect ratio of texture on the connection part gradually changed to avoid any abrupt change of texture. In both experiments (N = 30 for Experiment 1; N = 47 for Experiment 2), observers viewed the two-folded surfaces and estimated 3D slants of the upper surfaces by aligning their hand with the orientations of the upper surfaces while they were asked to ignore the lower surfaces. The estimates from both experiments showed that decrease in aspect ratio of the upper surfaces led to the observers’ overestimation of surface slant, as previous studies have shown. Most interestingly, decrease in aspect ratio of the lower surfaces, which had no direct relations to the task, made the observers significantly underestimate slant of the upper surface, even when aspect ratios of the lower surfaces varied trial by trial. These findings indicate that isotropy is not fixed knowledge but more likely to be contextual information. Observers can flexibly choose whether to adhere to the presumption of isotropy, depending on their environmental understanding."

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×