September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Which shape features determine detectability of camouflaged radial frequency patterns?
Author Affiliations
  • Wei Hau Lew
    University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston TX
    Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology Harvard Medical School
  • Samuel P. Smithers
    Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston MA
  • Peter J. Bex
    Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston MA
  • Daniel R. Coates
    University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston TX
    University of Washington, Department of Ophthalmology, Seattle WA
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 1319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1319
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Wei Hau Lew, Samuel P. Smithers, Peter J. Bex, Daniel R. Coates; Which shape features determine detectability of camouflaged radial frequency patterns?. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):1319. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1319.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

When the texture or pattern of stationary targets is closely matched to the background, the detection of these camouflaged targets relies on identifying specific features such as the edge of its outline. Previously, we reported the results of behavioral experiments that tested the detection time of targets defined by radial frequency (RF= 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 14, and 20) and amplitude (0.1, 0.25, and 0.5) with a pink noise (1/f) texture against a pink noise background. At low amplitude, mid RF targets (i.e. 8 and 10) were among the hardest to detect. For RF≥ 8, the time taken to detect the targets decreased (targets became easier to detect) as amplitude increased. Since it is still poorly understood what aspects of a target shape influence target detectability, here the local and global features of each shape were analyzed. We calculated the global features of perimeter, area, and aspect ratio (width/height of each shape “arm”). The osculating circle method was used to compute the local curvature, its Sum-Squared Difference (SSD), and Mean of Absolute Difference (MAD). We found that target detection time as a function of the perimeter had an inverted U-shape. The area did not systematically affect detection time. The aspect ratio also had an inverted U-shape, whereby targets were easier to detect when their arm’s aspect ratio was <2. For target curvature, there was a positive correlation between SSD of the curvature and target detectability (Pearson’s r= 0.844, p <0.001), but no correlation for MAD. While the local SSD was directly correlated and most predictive, global features (perimeter and aspect ratio) can also influence detectability.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×