September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Decoding predicted future states from the brain’s ‘physics engine’
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • RT Pramod
    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT
    McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT
  • Elizabeth Mieczkowski
    Princeton University
  • Cyn Fang
    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT
    McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT
  • Josh Tenenbaum
    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT
    McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT
  • Nancy Kanwisher
    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT
    McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This project was funded by NSF NCS Project 6945933 (NGK)
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 1258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1258
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      RT Pramod, Elizabeth Mieczkowski, Cyn Fang, Josh Tenenbaum, Nancy Kanwisher; Decoding predicted future states from the brain’s ‘physics engine’. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):1258. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1258.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Successful engagement with the physical world requires rapid online prediction, from swerving to avoid a collision to returning a ping-pong serve. Here we test the hypothesis that physical prediction is implemented in a set of parietal and frontal regions (aka the "hypothesized Physics Network '' or hPN) that model the structure of the relevant scene and run forward simulations to predict future states. For physical scene understanding and prediction, contact relationships between objects such as support, containment, and attachment are critical because they constrain an object's fate: if a container moves, so does its containee. In Experiment 1, participants (N = 14) were scanned with fMRI while viewing short videos (~3s) depicting contact (contain, support, attach) and non-contact events. MVPA revealed scenario-invariant decoding of the presence versus absence of a contact relationship that was significant in the hPN but not in the ventral pathway. Experiment 2 tested whether the hPN also carries information about predicted future contact events, as expected if the hPN is engaged in forward simulation. Indeed, the voxel response patterns in hPN distinguishing between perceived contact and no-contact events were similar even for predicted events where contact was predictable but not shown. This prediction of future contact events, which generalized across objects and scenarios, was found even though participants were performing an unrelated one-back task, and was detected only in the hPN, not the ventral visual pathway. In both experiments, the key results were absent in the primary visual cortex, arguing against low-level visual feature confounds accounting for these findings. Thus, we find that the hPN both (a) encodes physical relationships between objects in a scene, and (b) predicts future states of the world, as expected if this network serves as the brain’s ‘Physics Engine’.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×