September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
An Attentional Serial Reaction Time Task
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Margaret L. Duffy
    The Ohio State University
  • M. Fiona Molloy
    University of Michigan
  • David E. Osher
    The Ohio State University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Alkire Research Fund, Undergraduate Research Scholarship (Ohio State)
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 1232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1232
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Margaret L. Duffy, M. Fiona Molloy, David E. Osher; An Attentional Serial Reaction Time Task. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):1232. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1232.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The brain has the ability to filter and prioritize a cacophony of often extraneous visual stimuli via a mechanism called attention. Traditionally, attention is thought to be guided by either a goal-driven mechanism (top-down, supported by fronto-parietal brain networks) or a stimulus-driven mechanism (bottom-up, supported by visual networks). However, recent work has highlighted a type of attention that does not fit within this dichotomy: one guided by memory. There are multiple forms of memory, including habitual memory - inflexible, insensitive to outcome devaluation, and automatic. Contextual cueing has arguably demonstrated habit-like attention, but effect sizes are very small, especially for individual subjects. Within the domain of habit research, serial reaction time (SRT) tasks have demonstrated habitual properties; however, this type of task typically is used for motor habits. For the present study, we adapted the SRT with spatial-temporal demands to probe habit-like attention. Participants were tasked with making decisions about stimuli that appeared in blocks alternating between learned and novel locations. We assessed participants’ knowledge of the learned sequence with a short post-test that asked them to predict the next location of the image in this sequence. Finally, we altered the learned sequence to test perseveration errors of the attentional habit. This task produces very large reaction time and accuracy effects for the learned spatiotemporal attentional sequence, demonstrable in individual subjects. Participants appeared to possess explicit knowledge of the learned sequence, however, challenging the inclusion of implicitness as a criterion for attentional habits. Further, the altered sequence demonstrated a difference in reaction time between critical (altered) and non-critical trials in the learned sequence, and a trending effect for accuracy. Future directions include the implementation of the task using a more complex learned sequence and a more highly powered reversal task. This study is part of an undergraduate honors thesis.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×