September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
Parsing Pulses: Testing the Limits of Temporal Phase Perception in Human Vision
Author Affiliations
  • Andrew Lisech
    University of Delaware
  • Xinyi Yuan
    University of Delaware
    Beijing Normal University
  • Keith A. Schneider
    University of Delaware
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 1228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1228
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Andrew Lisech, Xinyi Yuan, Keith A. Schneider; Parsing Pulses: Testing the Limits of Temporal Phase Perception in Human Vision. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):1228. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1228.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Introduction: Humans can detect luminance flicker exceeding 60 Hz, but the threshold for perceiving the flicker’s phase is much lower (~7-10 Hz). As a precursor to future experiments investigating this temporal bottleneck and the broader dynamics of visual perception, we replicated Aghdaee and Cavanagh (2007) using stimuli devoid of spatial and temporal transients. Methods: Twelve subjects judged whether two monochromatic Gaussians, oscillating sinusoidally between black and white, were in-phase or 180° out-of-phase. A 1440 Hz PROPixx projector (VPixx Technologies) displayed stimulus pairs at 4° eccentricity, spaced 1.8° or 5° apart, either: 1) left and right of the vertical meridian in the opposite-hemifield condition, or 2) above and below the horizontal meridian within the same hemifield. Using the method of constant stimuli, we measured phase detection thresholds across 11 oscillation frequencies (1–31 Hz), conducting 25 repetitions for each of the randomly interleaved conditions. To prevent visual offset artifacts, stimuli oscillated continuously until subjects responded. Thresholds were determined by fitting a cumulative normal function with a lower asymptote parameter. Results: Inter-stimulus spacing distance revealed a significant main effect, indicating subjects discriminated phase at higher frequencies for closely-spaced stimuli (11.13 Hz) than for farther stimuli (8.15 Hz). The main effect of hemifield was not significant, and no significant interaction with distance was observed. Notably, the asymptote parameter differed significantly from zero in the near condition, with subjects retaining a small (~60%) but significant ability to determine phase at even the highest frequencies tested. Conclusion: The advantage of near stimuli suggests the involvement of a low-level primary sensory mechanism, such as local motion detection circuits. In contrast, comparing two far-spaced stimuli requires higher-level (non-local) and slower mechanisms which possess timing consistent with conscious awareness. Future work should consider mechanisms such as discrete perception and onset artifacts similar to the Fröhlich Illusion.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×