September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
fMRI reveals a modulatory role of visual field meridians on object-based selective attention
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • David H. Hughes
    Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University
  • Adam J. Barnas
    Department of Psychology, University of Florida
  • Adam S. Greenberg
    Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  This work was supported by grants from the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation (#2013400) and National Science Foundation (SBE 2122866).
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 1137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1137
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      David H. Hughes, Adam J. Barnas, Adam S. Greenberg; fMRI reveals a modulatory role of visual field meridians on object-based selective attention. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):1137. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1137.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Previous behavioral results demonstrated a shift direction anisotropy (SDA) during object-based attentional selection that was modulated by visual field meridians (Barnas & Greenberg, 2016; 2019). We hypothesized that differential prioritization of horizontal and vertical target locations gave rise to the SDA due to attentional resources being divided differently by horizontal and vertical meridians. To test this, we measured BOLD signals during fMRI from visual cortex in 19 healthy adults. Subjects detected a target (letter T among distracting Ls) within an L-shaped object with two possible locations: vertex in upper-left (UL) or lower-right (LR) quadrant. Cue validity was 60% valid, 20 % invalid, 20% catch. Invalid trials were counterbalanced between shift orientation (horizontal and vertical) and whether target detection required a meridian crossing (crossing and non-crossing). The crossing SDA was significantly greater than the non-crossing SDA for the UL (p = .039, d = 0.60), but not the LR (p = .454, d = 0.04) object. A repeated measures ANOVA of cue-related activation revealed significant main effects of object location (p < .001) and retinotopic ROI (p < .001), as well as a significant interaction (p = .007). Post-hoc Tukey test for the UL object revealed no activation differences between valid and either non-crossing invalid-horizontal (p = .963, d = 0.17) or non-crossing invalid-vertical (p = .969, d = 0.15) locations, suggesting that attention pools within the cued quadrant. Compared to non-crossing, crossing activation was reduced (invalid-horizontal: p < .001, d = 0.95; invalid-vertical: p < .001, d = 0.59). This prioritization of each invalid location is consistent with the attentional spreading hypothesis (Richard et al., 2008). However, cue-related activation did not fully account for the SDA. Instead, the SDA could arise from differential spreading of attention resulting from stronger segregation of pools of resources by the vertical versus horizontal meridian.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×