September 2024
Volume 24, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2024
The Eyes Still Have It: Eye Processing is a Distinct Deficit in Developmental Prosopagnosia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Joseph DeGutis
    Boston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
    Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • Asha Jotwani
    Boston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
    Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • Mia Haidamus
    Boston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
    Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • Regan Fry
    Boston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
    Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • Leah Kirsch
    Boston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
    Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  • Maruti Mishra
    Boston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
    Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
    Department of Psychology, California State University Bakersfield, CA
  • Alison Campbell
    Boston Attention and Learning Laboratory, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
    Department of Psychiatry, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA
  • Footnotes
    Acknowledgements  Funded by National Eye Institute R01EY032510 awarded to JD
Journal of Vision September 2024, Vol.24, 1060. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1060
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Joseph DeGutis, Asha Jotwani, Mia Haidamus, Regan Fry, Leah Kirsch, Maruti Mishra, Alison Campbell; The Eyes Still Have It: Eye Processing is a Distinct Deficit in Developmental Prosopagnosia. Journal of Vision 2024;24(10):1060. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.10.1060.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that efficient processing of the information-rich eye region is important for face recognition. However, the extent to which eye processing is impaired in developmental prosopagnosia (DP) and how these potential impairments contribute to DPs’ face perception deficits remains unclear. To address this, we had 110 DPs and 133 controls perform validated face matching assessments (Cambridge Face Perception Test, Computerized Benton Facial Recognition Test, Same/Different Face Matching Test) and the Georges and Part-Whole tasks to measure feature (eye, nose, mouth, chin, forehead sensitivity) and holistic processing (part-whole holistic advantage) abilities. Regarding feature processing, DPs were most impaired on the eye conditions (Georges eye spacing and size trials, Part-Whole part eye trials) but showed relatively normal mouth (Georges mouth size trials and Part-Whole part mouth trials, though deficient Georges mouth spacing trials) and chin performance. DPs also showed a significantly reduced Part-Whole holistic advantage. We next ran factor analyses in DPs and controls using all the facial feature conditions and holistic advantage. In both groups, we found a three-factor solution: a clearly distinct eye processing factor as well as less distinct lower facial feature (mouth and chin trials) and holistic processing factors. Notably, in regression models using factor scores to predict face perception ability (face matching performance), both DPs and controls showed that eye processing ability predicted the most unique variance, while holistic processing also predicted unique variance. Finally, in a follow-up experiment to determine the generality of DP eye impairments, we examined eye gaze perception and reading emotion from the eyes and found subtle impairments in DPs. In sum, these results demonstrate that, in both DPs and controls, eye processing ability is distinct from more general facial feature processing and holistic processing and is a crucial contributor to DP face perception deficits.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×