Journal of Vision Cover Image for Volume 25, Issue 5
April 2025
Volume 25, Issue 5
Open Access
Optica Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   April 2025
Poster Session: The effect of fixational eye-movements on the temporal summation at detection threshold: A simulation study
Author Affiliations
  • Zahra M. Bagheri
    Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford
  • Allie C. Schneider
    Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford
  • Mengxin Wang
    Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford
  • David H. Brainard
    Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania
  • Hannah E. Smithson
    Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford
Journal of Vision April 2025, Vol.25, 24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.5.24
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Zahra M. Bagheri, Allie C. Schneider, Mengxin Wang, David H. Brainard, Hannah E. Smithson; Poster Session: The effect of fixational eye-movements on the temporal summation at detection threshold: A simulation study. Journal of Vision 2025;25(5):24. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.5.24.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

We explored how fixational eye movements (FEMs) affect threshold temporal summation of increment pulses using realistic simulations of early visual processing. Using the Image Systems Engineering Toolbox for Biology, we assessed performance in a spatial 2AFC increment detection task, where the observer identified whether a stimulus appeared on the left or right. The signal-known-exactly ideal observer was trained on the noise-free photocurrent output of the cone mosaic for both stimulus alternatives, with performance calculated using noisy instances of photocurrents, given FEMs knowledge. The stimuli, modelled as 0.24x2.2 arcmin increments of 543 nm light presented via an AOSLO, included both a single 2 ms flash and pairs of flashes separated by interstimulus intervals (ISI) of 17 ms, 33 ms, 100 ms, or 300 ms. Detection thresholds, defined as the stimulus contrast corresponding to 75% correct, were assessed with and without FEMs. Without FEMs, thresholds for detecting two flashes separated by 17-100 ms slightly increased with ISI but remained lower than those for a single flash. With FEMs, the modelled differences between single- and two-flash thresholds were less pronounced, suggesting that, at the level of photocurrent signals, FEMs reduce the benefits of temporal summation for detection. Future work will quantify this reduction by simulating FEMs with varying velocities and explore if adding a temporal adaptation stage improves effect of FEMs' on performance.

Footnotes
 Funding: UKRI Physics of Life EP/W023873/1
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×