The change in the average proportion of the trial spent fixating the target throughout the exposure phase was analyzed using an LMM. All blinks were removed from analysis before this calculation. The difference estimate between the delay conditions was nonsignificant, β = –0.0003, t(30) = –0.04, p = 0.967, showing no significant difference in the average target fixation proportion between the constant delay condition, 79.6%, 95% CI [77.6%, 81.5%], and the varying delay condition, 80.5%, 95% CI [78.5%, 82.4%]. The slope estimate for the block number was significant, β = –0.0006, t(30) = –3.42, p = 0.002, showing a decrease in the target fixation proportion as the block number increased. However, there was no evidence of an interaction, β = 0.0002, t = –1.40, p = 0.171. The change in the average proportion of the trial spent fixating the target from pre-exposure to post-exposure was investigated using a 2 × 2 ANOVA. The main effect of the phase was nonsignificant, F(1, 30) = 0.28, p = 0.598, ηp² = 0.01, showing no significant change from pre-exposure (73.4%) to post-exposure (73.9%). The main effect of the delay condition was nonsignificant, F(1, 30) = 0.25, p = 0.622, ηp² = 0.01, showing no significant differences between the constant (73.4%) and the varying delay condition (73.9%). The interaction was also nonsignificant, F(1, 30) = 0.004, p = 0.951, ηp² = 0.0001.