Search | JOV | ARVO Journals

View

Showing 1 – 20 of 43

SORT: Best Match Most Recent Oldest

VIEW: Basic | Expanded

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2019

The dominance of spatial information in location judgments: A persistent congruency bias even amidst conflicting statistical regularities

Anisha S Babu; Paul S Scotti; Julie D Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2019; 19(10):31. doi: 10.1167/19.10.31

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2019

Relational Interactions between Visual Memory Representations Increase with Maintenance Duration

Paul S Scotti; Yoolim Hong; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2019; 19(10):77a. doi: 10.1167/19.10.77a

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2019

A Matter of Expectations: Lapses in Spatial Attention May Be Driven by Anticipatory Attentional Shifts

Christopher M Jones; Emma W Dowd; Julie D Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2019; 19(10):102b. doi: 10.1167/19.10.102b

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2019

Neural reconstructions of attended object features using fMRI and EEG

Jiageng Chen; Emma W Dowd; Maurryce D Starks; Julie D Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2019; 19(10):269c. doi: 10.1167/19.10.269c

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract May 2019

Neural representations of attention across saccades: More similar to shifting or to holding covert attention?

Xiaoli Zhang; Julie D Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2019; 19(10):319c. doi: 10.1167/19.10.319c

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2018

Scene content is predominantly conveyed by high spatial frequencies in scene-selective visual cortex

Dirk Walther; Daniel Berman; Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2018; 18(10):1241-1241. doi: 10.1167/18.10.1241

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2018

Localizing visual targets across saccades: Do nontarget landmarks really help?

Xiaoli Zhang; Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2018; 18(10):1287-1287. doi: 10.1167/18.10.1287

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2018

Statistical Regularities During Object Encoding Distort Long-term Memory

Paul Scotti; Yoolim Hong; Julie Golomb; Andrew Leber

Journal of Vision. 2018; 18(10):1309-1309. doi: 10.1167/18.10.1309

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2018

Remapping of object features: Implications of the two-stage theory of spatial remapping

Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2018; 18(10):1366-1366. doi: 10.1167/18.10.1366

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2018

Errors without doubt: Stimulus-driven attentional capture leads to feature-binding errors but no loss in confidence

Jiageng Chen; Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2018; 18(10):460-460. doi: 10.1167/18.10.460

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2018

Object-feature binding survives dynamic shifts of spatial attention

Emma Dowd; Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2018; 18(10):18-18. doi: 10.1167/18.10.18

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2018

Depth sensitivity of category-selective visual areas to preferred and non-preferred stimuli

Samoni Nag; Daniel Berman; Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2018; 18(10):401-401. doi: 10.1167/18.10.401

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract August 2017

Dynamically tracking the neural signatures of visual attention across a saccade

Jiageng Chen; Xiaoli Zhang; Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2017; 17(10):880-880. doi: 10.1167/17.10.880

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract August 2017

Attentional capture by working memory does not interfere with visual feature perception

Emma Dowd; Samoni Nag; Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2017; 17(10):956-956. doi: 10.1167/17.10.956

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract August 2017

The Influence of Ensemble Statistics and Focused Attention on Feature Perception

Jane Beaufore; Jiageng Chen; Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2017; 17(10):958-958. doi: 10.1167/17.10.958

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract August 2017

Memory for retinotopic locations is more accurate than memory for spatiotopic locations, even when intending to reach.

Anna Shafer-Skelton; Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2017; 17(10):1235-1235. doi: 10.1167/17.10.1235

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract August 2017

Independent and overlapping neural representations of saccades, attention shifts, and reference frames

Xiaoli Zhang; Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2017; 17(10):522-522. doi: 10.1167/17.10.522

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract August 2017

"Depth-otopic" mapping of human visual cortex

Julie Golomb; Daniel Berman; Nonie Finlayson

Journal of Vision. 2017; 17(10):586-586. doi: 10.1167/17.10.586

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2016

Visual stability across saccades: Do the number and spatial location of non-targets influence target location processing?

Xiaoli Zhang; Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2016; 16(12):109-109. doi: 10.1167/16.12.109

Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract September 2016

Are 2D and 3D location equally prioritized in object processing?

Nonie Finlayson; Julie Golomb

Journal of Vision. 2016; 16(12):288-288. doi: 10.1167/16.12.288

1 2 3

Next 20 Results »

Advertisement